DECISION INTELLIGENCE FOR CONSTRUCTION

The software makes the decision.

Not a system that organises project information and leaves the judgment to whoever is available. cAIstruct reads the contract, the drawings, the specification, the programme and the live project record — then recommends what should be done, and shows the evidence behind it.

Fewermanagement resources
Fewerdisconnected systems
More consistentproject decisions

cAIstruct automates work traditionally performed by project managers, commercial teams, procurement teams and project administrators. Built for owners, developers and corporate institutions.

Tender — structural package 4 bidders · levelled
ILLUSTRATIVE DECISION EXAMPLE
RECOMMENDED AWARD Contractor B at $43.0M — not Contractor A at $42.1M.
LevellingA excluded facade cladding and four months of preliminaries. Priced back in at the other bidders’ rates: +$1.4M.
ContractA’s qualification on ground conditions conflicts with clause 4.12 of the employer’s requirements.
ProgrammeB’s sequence matches the tender programme. A’s adds six weeks to the critical path.
ForecastExpected final cost: A $44.9M, B $43.4M.
Lower total risk and lower expected final cost, despite the higher tender figure. Every line links to the document it came from.
WITH VAULT ENABLED, ADDITIONALLY Contractor A generated 11% more change order value and averaged 37 days late across three previous projects with your organisation.

RUN IT HERE

Pick a drawing package. cAIstruct decides.

Three real situations. The same engine that reads an owner’s live tender package — reading the evidence, classifying every finding, and reaching a position it will defend.

Three documents, 41 sheets. Takes a moment.

THE PROBLEM

Your project succeeds or fails on whichever project manager you were assigned.

One manager has met this problem before. Another hasn’t. One reads the contract correctly. Another misses a clause. One sees the financial consequence immediately. Another sees it in the monthly report. That variance is not a training problem — it is structural, and as an owner you carry it across every project you run.

TRADITIONAL MODEL
Project→Individual PM→ Judgment→Decision

The quality of the decision is the quality of the person available that day. When they leave, what they knew leaves with them.

WITH cAIstruct
Project→Evidence + know-how→ cAIstruct→Consistent decision

The same evidence, weighed the same way, against the same standard — and the reasoning is recorded, so the decision can be defended later.

Same evidence. Same logic. Same standard. Every project.

Regardless of which project, which manager, which office, which city or which employee.

The cheapest tender and the cheapest project are rarely the same contractor. Levelling is the work of finding that out before you award, not eighteen months afterwards in a claim.

Put one project through it.

Bring a tender you have already awarded. If the platform reaches the same decision your team did, you have a benchmark. If it reaches a different one, that is the conversation worth having.